Re: pmccabe2html: more nits; build-aux confusion

[Reuben Thomas]

On 21 September 2010 14:55, Simon Josefsson <address@hidden> wrote:
> Reuben Thomas <address@hidden> writes:
>
>> On 21 September 2010 13:38, Simon Josefsson <address@hidden> wrote:
>>> Reuben Thomas <address@hidden> writes:
>>>
>>>> 1. The example Makefile.am code has "lib/" rather than "src/" in the
>>>> path to the source code, even though it's clearly the package source
>>>> that is to be analysed, not the gnulib library code.
>>>
>>> This is because it is an example, and the projects I used it for had the
>>> "real" code in lib/ (and the gnulib code in gl/ or similar).  Maybe the
>>> example could be changed to use src/ as that may be more common, but
>>> still, it is an example snippet that needs to be adapted by the
>>> maintainer anyway...
>>
>> Indeed. Maybe src/ is rather commoner as a source directory?
>>
>> Attached, two patches, one to s/lib/src/ and one to fix a typo that an
>> earlier patch somehow introduced (s/PACKAG/PACKAGE/). Sorry about the
>> latter.
>
> Thanks, applied.  In the future, please also write a ChangeLog entry.

Yes, sorry, not writing ChangeLog entries for patches is a very bad
habit of mine which I always tell myself off for and it's about time I
actually did something about it.

-- 
http://rrt.sc3d.org