[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Question about some fields in regex's re_pattern_buffer
From: |
Bruno Haible |
Subject: |
Re: Question about some fields in regex's re_pattern_buffer |
Date: |
Thu, 29 Jul 2010 21:25:18 +0200 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.9.9 |
Reuben Thomas wrote:
> /* This data structure represents a compiled pattern. Before calling
> the pattern compiler, the fields `buffer', `allocated', `fastmap',
> `translate', and `no_sub' can be set. After the pattern has been
> compiled, the `re_nsub' field is available. All other fields are
> private to the regex routines. */
>
> Note in particular that last sentence. Is is true? Looking at the code
> suggests the opposite
Also, in grep/src/dfasearch.c the not_eol field is being set right before
re_match and re_search.
Bruno
- Question about some fields in regex's re_pattern_buffer, Reuben Thomas, 2010/07/29
- Re: Question about some fields in regex's re_pattern_buffer,
Bruno Haible <=
- Re: Question about some fields in regex's re_pattern_buffer, Reuben Thomas, 2010/07/29
- Re: Question about some fields in regex's re_pattern_buffer, Bruno Haible, 2010/07/29
- Re: Question about some fields in regex's re_pattern_buffer, Reuben Thomas, 2010/07/29
- Re: Question about some fields in regex's re_pattern_buffer, Reuben Thomas, 2010/07/30
- Re: Question about some fields in regex's re_pattern_buffer, Paolo Bonzini, 2010/07/30
- Re: Question about some fields in regex's re_pattern_buffer, Reuben Thomas, 2010/07/30
- Re: Question about some fields in regex's re_pattern_buffer, Paolo Bonzini, 2010/07/30
- Re: Question about some fields in regex's re_pattern_buffer, Reuben Thomas, 2010/07/30
- Re: Question about some fields in regex's re_pattern_buffer, Paolo Bonzini, 2010/07/30
- Re: Question about some fields in regex's re_pattern_buffer, Reuben Thomas, 2010/07/30