[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: global year updates
From: |
Bruno Haible |
Subject: |
Re: global year updates |
Date: |
Mon, 5 Apr 2010 16:07:34 +0100 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.9.9 |
Eric Blake wrote:
> I see no reason to remove years that were added during a global year update.
Listing the years individually gave at least a certain idea about whether a
file is "active", i.e. heavily used and maintained, or on the bitrot slope.
Well, you can also see that by peeking into the git history.
I gave my ok for the global year update in December, but now I find that I
actually liked the previous way of updating the list of years incrementally,
not globally.
Bruno