[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: argp vs ':', '+', and '-' in getopt
|
From: |
Eric Blake |
|
Subject: |
Re: argp vs ':', '+', and '-' in getopt |
|
Date: |
Fri, 06 Nov 2009 06:02:42 -0700 |
|
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.23) Gecko/20090812 Thunderbird/2.0.0.23 Mnenhy/0.7.6.666 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
According to Ben Asselstine on 11/6/2009 2:24 AM:
> Hi folks,
>
> Argp doesn't protect the user from picking short options that
> interfere with argp's getopt implementation.
You may want to file this as a bug against glibc, since gnulib's argp is
inherited from upstream.
http://sources.redhat.com/bugzilla/
- --
Don't work too hard, make some time for fun as well!
Eric Blake address@hidden
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (Cygwin)
Comment: Public key at home.comcast.net/~ericblake/eblake.gpg
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iEYEARECAAYFAkr0HnIACgkQ84KuGfSFAYBzzACfRkDPzIl1+WJNgLrpn5JdjgvM
zkkAoNHQI58sTrEbxUJOdJ0yh+TLFfyw
=3r4h
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
- argp vs ':', '+', and '-' in getopt, Ben Asselstine, 2009/11/06
- Re: argp vs ':', '+', and '-' in getopt, Paolo Bonzini, 2009/11/06
- Re: argp vs ':', '+', and '-' in getopt,
Eric Blake <=
- Re: argp vs ':', '+', and '-' in getopt, Sergey Poznyakoff, 2009/11/06
- Re: argp vs ':', '+', and '-' in getopt, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2009/11/06
- Re: argp vs ':', '+', and '-' in getopt, Sergey Poznyakoff, 2009/11/06
- Re: argp vs ':', '+', and '-' in getopt, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2009/11/06
Re: argp vs ':', '+', and '-' in getopt, Sergey Poznyakoff, 2009/11/06