[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Explicit interpreter paths considered harmful
From: |
Jim Meyering |
Subject: |
Re: Explicit interpreter paths considered harmful |
Date: |
Thu, 29 Oct 2009 16:15:06 +0100 |
Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Jim Meyering <address@hidden> writes:
>
>> However, is this really necessary?
>> You're not running gitlog-to-changelog manually, are you?
>> If it's scripted, you can easily invoke it via "perl gitlog-to-changelog ..."
>
> True, but then among the scripts under ‘build-aux’, some are invoked
> directly by ‘maint.mk’, some like ‘announce-gen’ are typically invoked
> manually, etc. And they have the executable bit set anyway, so it feels
> more natural to run them directly.
>
> What do you think?
Send a patch ;-)
- Explicit interpreter paths considered harmful, Ludovic Courtès, 2009/10/29
- Re: Explicit interpreter paths considered harmful, Paolo Bonzini, 2009/10/29
- Re: Explicit interpreter paths considered harmful, Ludovic Courtès, 2009/10/29
- Re: Explicit interpreter paths considered harmful, Paolo Bonzini, 2009/10/29
- Re: Explicit interpreter paths considered harmful, Jim Meyering, 2009/10/29
- Re: Explicit interpreter paths considered harmful, Ludovic Courtès, 2009/10/29
- Re: Explicit interpreter paths considered harmful,
Jim Meyering <=
- Re: Explicit interpreter paths considered harmful, Ludovic Courtès, 2009/10/29
- Re: Explicit interpreter paths considered harmful, Simon Josefsson, 2009/10/30
- Re: Explicit interpreter paths considered harmful, Ludovic Courtès, 2009/10/30
Re: Explicit interpreter paths considered harmful, Ludovic Courtès, 2009/10/29
Re: Explicit interpreter paths considered harmful, Karl Berry, 2009/10/29