[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: IBM PTF's to fix #include_next bug in IBM C 9.0/10.1
From: |
James Youngman |
Subject: |
Re: IBM PTF's to fix #include_next bug in IBM C 9.0/10.1 |
Date: |
Tue, 17 Feb 2009 10:45:12 +0000 |
On Sun, Feb 15, 2009 at 11:04 PM, Bruno Haible <address@hidden> wrote:
> + dnl The include of <stdio.h> is because IBM C 9.0, 10.1 (original
> + dnl versions, prior to 2009-01 updates) on AIX 6.1 supports include_next
> + dnl when used as first preprocessor directive in a file, but not when
> + dnl preceded by another include directive.
I suggest
dnl Prior to the 2009-01 updates, IBM C versions 9.0 and 10.1 support
include_next when used
dnl as the first preprocessor directive in a file, but not when it is
preceded by another include
dnl directive. To work around this, we include <stdio.h> here.
dnl Additionally, ...
This avoids the mixed singlular/plural subject in the sentence and
puts in a missing "the".
James.