[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Relocatable packages, once again
|
From: |
Paolo Bonzini |
|
Subject: |
Re: Relocatable packages, once again |
|
Date: |
Wed, 11 Feb 2009 09:59:28 +0100 |
|
User-agent: |
Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (Macintosh/20081209) |
> I have noticed that discussions about relocatability occured in the far
> 2003. Why didn't relocatability maid its way into GTK+ and other
> autotools packages? Isn't it essential to make a "normal" program?
It is not easy. In GNU Smalltalk, for example, on Mac OS X I only make
the package relocatable if --disable-shared is used.
Properly fixing this would require hacking Apple's install_name_tool
into libtool.
Paolo
- Relocatable packages, once again, Ivan Levashew, 2009/02/11
- Re: Relocatable packages, once again,
Paolo Bonzini <=
- Re: Relocatable packages, once again, Ivan Levashew, 2009/02/11
- Re: Relocatable packages, once again, Paolo Bonzini, 2009/02/11
- Re: Relocatable packages, once again, Ivan Levashew, 2009/02/11
- Re: Relocatable packages, once again, Paolo Bonzini, 2009/02/11
- Re: Relocatable packages, once again, Ivan Levashew, 2009/02/11