Re: [PATCH] setsockopt: Add support for timeouts on W32

[Paolo Bonzini]

> Looks all fine to me, but it's Simon and Paolo who have to decide on this.
> Good point. The prototypes should have socklen_t.

Both are ok.

> Here is another proposed
> patch, also for consideration by Simon and Paolo. - Regarding 'restrict',
> I never use this keyword because AFAIK, omitting it has no effect on
> correct programs; its presence is only a hint to the user that uses of
> the functions with daring overlap of argument locations are invalid,
> and in most cases a considerate programmer will not pass overlapping
> arguments to functions anyway. - Please correct me if I'm wrong.

If you want to add restrict since you are at it, why not.

Paolo