[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: mingw
From: |
Bruno Haible |
Subject: |
Re: mingw |
Date: |
Sun, 21 Sep 2008 17:22:08 +0200 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.5.4 |
Hi Eric,
Eric Blake wrote:
> Actually, in the latest version of mingw, you have the option to use a
> more POSIX compliant [printf] instead of being stuck with MSVCRT's flaws:
> http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-announce/2008-09/msg00008.html
Interesting... But I think gnulib should continue to be developed against
the original mingw, because
- that's the one that is available without any extra flags/options,
- most problems of MSVCRT are still present with mingw "gcc -posix".
Bruno
- Re: snapshot in preparation for m4 1.4.12, Eric Blake, 2008/09/12
- Re: snapshot in preparation for m4 1.4.12, Eric Blake, 2008/09/13
- Re: snapshot in preparation for m4 1.4.12, Eric Blake, 2008/09/13
- Re: snapshot in preparation for m4 1.4.12, Bruno Haible, 2008/09/13
- vasnprintf(-0.0L) on Irix [was: snapshot in preparation for m4 1.4.12], Eric Blake, 2008/09/16
- Re: vasnprintf(-0.0L) on Irix [was: snapshot in preparation for m4 1.4.12], Bruno Haible, 2008/09/18
- Re: vasnprintf(-0.0L) on Irix [was: snapshot in preparation for m4 1.4.12], Eric Blake, 2008/09/20
- Re: vasnprintf(-0.0L) on Irix [was: snapshot in preparation for m4 1.4.12], Bruno Haible, 2008/09/21
- Re: mingw,
Bruno Haible <=