[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: fflush after ungetc
From: |
Eric Blake |
Subject: |
Re: fflush after ungetc |
Date: |
Fri, 28 Mar 2008 23:44:20 -0600 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.12) Gecko/20080213 Thunderbird/2.0.0.12 Mnenhy/0.7.5.666 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
According to Eric Blake on 3/28/2008 11:14 PM:
| There is no need to penalize Linux with an fflush wrapper if the only
| issue with it is behavior during condition 2, since no sane code should be
| trying to use condition 2. But we should probably open a glibc bug report.
http://sources.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5994
- --
Don't work too hard, make some time for fun as well!
Eric Blake address@hidden
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.8 (Cygwin)
Comment: Public key at home.comcast.net/~ericblake/eblake.gpg
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iEYEARECAAYFAkft1zQACgkQ84KuGfSFAYCyeQCfesFN4uHlQo3+EKGtCKtsfDbM
+EkAnR8MkOB5IsolmQl1pdBoQJDWuKum
=Vguf
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
- Re: fflush after ungetc, (continued)
- Re: fflush after ungetc, Eric Blake, 2008/03/07
- Message not available
- Re: fflush after ungetc, Eric Blake, 2008/03/07
- Re: fflush after ungetc, Bruno Haible, 2008/03/09
- Message not available
- Re: fflush after ungetc, Eric Blake, 2008/03/26
- Re: fflush after ungetc, Bruno Haible, 2008/03/06
- Re: fflush after ungetc, Eric Blake, 2008/03/06
- Re: fflush after ungetc, Bruno Haible, 2008/03/09
- Re: fflush after ungetc, Eric Blake, 2008/03/29
- Re: fflush after ungetc,
Eric Blake <=
- Re: fflush after ungetc, Bruno Haible, 2008/03/29
- Re: fflush after ungetc, Eric Blake, 2008/03/29
- Re: freadseek, Bruno Haible, 2008/03/30
- Re: fflush after ungetc, Bruno Haible, 2008/03/30
- Re: Cygwin ftell bug, Bruno Haible, 2008/03/06