[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: AC_COMPILE_IFELSE
From: |
Bruno Haible |
Subject: |
Re: AC_COMPILE_IFELSE |
Date: |
Thu, 6 Mar 2008 12:47:31 +0100 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.5.4 |
Simon Josefsson wrote:
> I find AC_TRY_COMPILE slightly easier to work with
> than AC_COMPILE_IFELSE so perhaps we could argue that it should be
> non-deprecated, unless there were a strong reason to deprecate it.
Likewise for me. AC_TRY_COMPILE has a more mnemonic name (it follows the
usual rule to use an English verb to as a function/macro name) and simpler
quoting rules than AC_COMPILE_IFELSE.
Bruno
- Re: __func__, Simon Josefsson, 2008/03/03
- Re: __func__, Bruno Haible, 2008/03/03
- Re: __func__, Simon Josefsson, 2008/03/04
- Re: __func__, Bruno Haible, 2008/03/04
- Re: __func__, Simon Josefsson, 2008/03/06
- Re: AC_COMPILE_IFELSE,
Bruno Haible <=
- Re: AC_COMPILE_IFELSE, Ralf Wildenhues, 2008/03/06
- Re: AC_COMPILE_IFELSE, Bruno Haible, 2008/03/06
- Re: AC_COMPILE_IFELSE, Eric Blake, 2008/03/06
- Re: __func__, Eric Blake, 2008/03/04
- Re: __func__, Simon Josefsson, 2008/03/06
- Re: __func__, Jim Meyering, 2008/03/06
- Re: __func__, Simon Josefsson, 2008/03/06
- Re: __func__, Simon Josefsson, 2008/03/06
- Re: __func__, Bruno Haible, 2008/03/06