[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: no license on some test modules
From: |
Eric Blake |
Subject: |
Re: no license on some test modules |
Date: |
Tue, 11 Dec 2007 19:18:35 +0000 (UTC) |
User-agent: |
Loom/3.14 (http://gmane.org/) |
Jim Meyering <jim <at> meyering.net> writes:
> > And indeed, there can be circular dependencies. I tested the same m4 setup
on
> > mingw. If libtests.a is listed first, progname.o is not included. But if
it
> > is listed second only, then gl_array_list.o generates a missing link to
xmalloc
> > and friends. The only solution is repeating the LDADD. I'm committing the
> > following:
> >
>
> Good catch.
> Thanks for dealing with it.
This may not be the end of the story. For M4 head, it is now triggering a
libtool bug - libtool mistakenly canonicalizes its link line, and discards one
of the two instances of $(local_ldadd), which means we are right back to the
link failures.
make[5]: `test-alloca-opt.exe' is up to date.
/bin/sh ../../libtool --tag=CC --mode=link gcc -std=gnu99 -gdwarf-2 -Wall -
Werror -o test-array_list.exe test-array_list.o
libtests.a ../../gnu/libgnu.la libtests.a /usr/local/lib/libintl.dll.a -
liconv -L/usr/local/lib
libtool: link: gcc -std=gnu99 -gdwarf-2 -Wall -Werror -o .libs/test-
array_list.exe test-array_list.o ../../gnu/.libs/libgnu.a
libtests.a /usr/local/lib/libintl.dll.a /usr/lib/libiconv.dll.a -L/usr/local/lib
libtests.a(gl_array_list.o): In function `gl_array_create_empty':
../../../tests/gnu/gl_array_list.c:61: undefined reference to `_xmalloc'
Maybe we need to make libtests.a shared if the gnulib library is shared?
--
Eric Blake
- no license on some test modules, Jim Meyering, 2007/12/05
- Re: no license on some test modules, Bruno Haible, 2007/12/07
- Re: no license on some test modules, Bruno Haible, 2007/12/10
- Re: no license on some test modules, Jim Meyering, 2007/12/10
- Re: no license on some test modules, Eric Blake, 2007/12/10
- Re: no license on some test modules, Eric Blake, 2007/12/11
- Re: no license on some test modules, Jim Meyering, 2007/12/11
- Re: no license on some test modules,
Eric Blake <=
- Re: no license on some test modules, Ralf Wildenhues, 2007/12/12
- Re: no license on some test modules, Eric Blake, 2007/12/12
- Re: no license on some test modules, Eric Blake, 2007/12/12
- Re: no license on some test modules, Bruno Haible, 2007/12/26
- Re: no license on some test modules, Bruno Haible, 2007/12/26