[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: getline.h
From: |
Paul Eggert |
Subject: |
Re: getline.h |
Date: |
Sun, 19 Aug 2007 03:17:14 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.1 (gnu/linux) |
Eric Blake <address@hidden> writes:
> I could go either way, although I'm leaning toward doing it now; I'll wait
> for anyone else to speak their mind.
I also lean towards doing it now, since I think it unlikely that
POSIX will change much before becoming official in this area,
and anyway its use in glibc <stdio.h> is a powerful argument.
- getline.h, Eric Blake, 2007/08/18
- Re: getline.h, Bruno Haible, 2007/08/18
- Re: getline.h, Eric Blake, 2007/08/18
- Re: getline.h,
Paul Eggert <=
- Re: getline.h, Jim Meyering, 2007/08/19
- Re: getline.h, Eric Blake, 2007/08/21
- Re: getline.h, Simon Josefsson, 2007/08/22
- Re: getline.h, Jim Meyering, 2007/08/22
- Re: getline.h, Bruno Haible, 2007/08/22
- Re: getline.h, Eric Blake, 2007/08/22
- Re: getline.h, Eric Blake, 2007/08/22
- Re: getline.h, Jim Meyering, 2007/08/23
- Re: getline.h, Simon Josefsson, 2007/08/23
- Re: getline.h, Jim Meyering, 2007/08/23