Re: RFT: *printf-posix modules

[Eric Blake]

Bruno Haible <bruno <at> clisp.org> writes:

> 
> Hi all,
> 
> This is a request for testing. The *printf-posix modules should not work
> fine and pass all tests on
>      IRIX 6.5

I noticed you added a patch that allows "nan0x7fffffff" instead of "nan".  My 
reading of POSIX says this is illegal and that IRIX has a bug; if the n-char-
sequence form of NaN is used, it must be in the style "nan(0x7fffffff)", with 
the ( and ) as literal characters.  Compare the wording in C99 and POSIX for 
strtod() and nan().

-- 
Eric Blake