[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: check for C99-compliant snprintf
From: |
Paul Eggert |
Subject: |
Re: check for C99-compliant snprintf |
Date: |
Fri, 16 Feb 2007 11:43:27 -0800 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.1008 (Gnus v5.10.8) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) |
Ben Pfaff <address@hidden> writes:
> We could of course test whether the system is Windows, using
> #if (defined _WIN32 || defined __WIN32__) && ! defined __CYGWIN__
> or similar. Is that a better idea?
Do you mean to have two Autoconf tests, one at compile-time (with the
above code), and one at run-time (with the code proposed earlier)?
I.e., do the run-time test only if the compile-time test indicates
that there may be trouble. That sounds a bit fancy, but it would
work.
Or, you could just do the compile-time test and assume the bug exists
if it fails. That should be good enough, too.
- check for C99-compliant snprintf, Ben Pfaff, 2007/02/16
- Re: check for C99-compliant snprintf, Paul Eggert, 2007/02/16
- Re: check for C99-compliant snprintf, Ben Pfaff, 2007/02/16
- Re: check for C99-compliant snprintf,
Paul Eggert <=
- Re: check for C99-compliant snprintf, Ben Pfaff, 2007/02/16
- Re: check for C99-compliant snprintf, Albert Chin, 2007/02/19
- Re: check for C99-compliant snprintf, Ben Pfaff, 2007/02/19
- Re: check for C99-compliant snprintf, Albert Chin, 2007/02/19
- Re: check for C99-compliant snprintf, Ben Pfaff, 2007/02/19
- Re: check for C99-compliant snprintf, Albert Chin, 2007/02/19
- Re: check for C99-compliant snprintf, Bruno Haible, 2007/02/19
- Re: check for C99-compliant snprintf, Ben Pfaff, 2007/02/19