bug-gnulib
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: time_r.h -> time_.h


From: Bruno Haible
Subject: Re: time_r.h -> time_.h
Date: Fri, 9 Feb 2007 02:06:16 +0100
User-agent: KMail/1.5.4

Simon Josefsson wrote:
> Any obvious reason we shouldn't create a time.h with the contents of
> the current time_r.h, using the same logic we use to replace string.h?
> 
> It would be nice to avoid '#include "time_r.h"' and just do '#include
> <time.h>' in my code.

The full TODO list for this topic is below.

But I would find it good to wait a month or so, to stabilize the idioms
used in <string.h> and string_h.m4. Not everyone has yet tried to compile
his project with -DGNULIB_POSIXCHECK and to see whether the warnings and
errors are useful. Also Paul has plans to simplify these idioms (although I
don't agree that it's possible to simplify them without sacrificing
either correctness, quality of error messages, or maintainability).

Bruno


<inttypes.h>
  strtoimax
  strtoumax

<limits.h>
  size_max.h

<math.h>
  mathl.h

<netdb.h>
  getaddrinfo.h

<search.h>
  tsearch.h

<signal.h>
  sigprocmask.h

<stdio.h>
  snprintf.h
  vsnprintf.h

<stdlib.h>
  exit.h
  mkdtemp.h
  mkstemp.h

<time.h>
  time_r.h
  timespec.h
  strptime.h

<unistd.h>
  chown
  dup2
  fchdir
  ftruncate
  getcwd.h
  getlogin_r.h
  getsubopt.h
  lstat
  readlink

<wchar.h>
  wcwidth.h

<arpa/inet.h>
  inet_ntop
  inet_pton





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]