Re: inline

[Ralf Wildenhues]

Hello Bruno,

* Bruno Haible wrote on Tue, Nov 07, 2006 at 02:38:25PM CET:
> Just for info. Here are some notes I collected about 'inline' three months
> ago. If it's too much details, skip the text until "Results" at the bottom :-)

Nice work!

> Which compilers don't yet support inline?
> Solaris 7 cc    lacks inline entirely
> HP-UX 11 cc     has an unusable inline (return type must not be a typedef)
> IRIX 6 cc       has __inline but does not understand  extern __inline.
> AIX 4 xlc       has __inline, uses the C99 semantics
> OSF/1 5.1 cc    has inline, uses the C99 semantics

Could you be bothered to specify this in more detail?  Is this AIX 4 or
4.x.y?  IRIX 6 or 6.5 (there is a decade in between)?  HP-UX 11.00 or
11.23 (and what HP compiler version)?  Generally, it's interesting to
know the latest version that still has bugs.

Cheers,
Ralf