[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [bug-gnulib] gpl and lgpl texi
From: |
Karl Berry |
Subject: |
Re: [bug-gnulib] gpl and lgpl texi |
Date: |
Mon, 4 Sep 2006 14:10:19 -0500 |
the title "Copying" of gpl.texi makes no sense
I agree, but I don't think we should change the node name in the
canonical gpl.texi. So many manuals already use "Copying".
The other title "Library Copying" is nonsense as well, since
RMS doesn't recomment the LGPL for libraries.
Good point. And the LGPL is far less used, so changing that node name
seems more plausible.
If someone will send me the combined patches, I'll ask rms. (Or, of
course, feel free to send to rms directly.)
k
- gpl and lgpl texi, Simon Josefsson, 2006/09/04
- Re: [bug-gnulib] gpl and lgpl texi, Bruno Haible, 2006/09/04
- Re: [bug-gnulib] gpl and lgpl texi, Bruno Haible, 2006/09/04
- Re: [bug-gnulib] gpl and lgpl texi,
Karl Berry <=
- Re: gpl and lgpl texi, Simon Josefsson, 2006/09/05
- Re: gpl and lgpl texi, Bruno Haible, 2006/09/05
- Re: gpl and lgpl texi, Paul Eggert, 2006/09/05
- Re: gpl and lgpl texi, Karl Berry, 2006/09/05
- Re: gpl and lgpl texi, Simon Josefsson, 2006/09/06
- Re: gpl and lgpl texi, Karl Berry, 2006/09/06
- Re: gpl and lgpl texi, Eric Blake, 2006/09/07
- Re: gpl and lgpl texi, Karl Berry, 2006/09/07