[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Possible spurious cycle detection with fts
From: |
Eric Blake |
Subject: |
Re: Possible spurious cycle detection with fts |
Date: |
Tue, 23 Aug 2005 21:31:07 +0000 (UTC) |
User-agent: |
Loom/3.14 (http://gmane.org/) |
Jim Meyering <jim <at> meyering.net> writes:
> I've just checked in these changes:
>
> 2005-08-14 Jim Meyering <jim <at> meyering.net>
>
> Sync from coreutils.
>
>
> * fts.c [! _LIBC]: Include "lstat.h" rather than rolling our own.
> * fts.c (fd_safer): Remove decl.
> Include fcntl--.h rather than unistd-safer.h
> (fts_safe_changedir): Don't call fd_safer; no longer needed
> now that we include fcntl--.h.
>
This patch breaks fts, as used by CVS findutils, because fcntl--.h is not part
of a gnulib module yet.
gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../.. -g -O2 -c fts.c
fts.c:151:22: fcntl--.h: No such file or directory
--
Eric Blake
- Possible spurious cycle detection with fts, James Youngman, 2005/08/08
- Re: Possible spurious cycle detection with fts, Jim Meyering, 2005/08/09
- Re: Possible spurious cycle detection with fts, James Youngman, 2005/08/09
- Re: Possible spurious cycle detection with fts, Jim Meyering, 2005/08/10
- Re: Possible spurious cycle detection with fts, Jim Meyering, 2005/08/14
- Re: Possible spurious cycle detection with fts,
Eric Blake <=
- Re: Possible spurious cycle detection with fts, Jim Meyering, 2005/08/24
- Re: Possible spurious cycle detection with fts, Paul Eggert, 2005/08/24
- Re: Possible spurious cycle detection with fts, Jim Meyering, 2005/08/24