[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Bug-gnulib] Re: Autoconf and differences between GNU getopt and
From: |
Derek Robert Price |
Subject: |
Re: [Bug-gnulib] Re: Autoconf and differences between GNU getopt and OpenBSD getopt |
Date: |
Fri, 15 Oct 2004 13:04:35 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7) Gecko/20040616 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Simon Josefsson wrote:
>Derek Robert Price <address@hidden> writes:
>
>>AC_DEFUN([gl_GETOPT],
>>[
>> gl_PREREQ_GETOPT
>>
>>
>>
>> GETOPT_H=
>> AC_CHECK_HEADERS([getopt.h], [], [GETOPT_H=getopt.h])
>> AC_CHECK_FUNCS([getopt_long_only], [], [GETOPT_H=getopt.h])
>>
>>
>>
>> if test -n "$GETOPT_H"; then
>> gl_GETOPT_SUBSTITUTE
>> fi
>>])
>>
>>
>>So, it does make sense that, if Alex's version of BSD comes packaged
>>with a getopt.h header but an incompatible getopt() function, then the
>>latest gl_GETOPT would incorrectly choose to use the system getopt()
>>function rather than the GNULIB substitute.
>
>
>Do BSD really have getopt_long_only? If so, then the getopt.m4 need
>to be improved...
According to Alex, yes, it does. A quick google search on "bsd
getopt_long_only" brings up a patch submission from February and a bug
report from March, so I presume the patch was accepted. Here's a link
to an email that claims getopt_long_only first appeared in OpenBSD 3.3
and FreeBSD 5.2:
<http://mailman.fastxs.net/pipermail/dbmail-dev/2004-July/004085.html>.
A more focused search of the FreeBSD site brings up a lot more bug
reports from March and the getopt_long.c file itself containing
getopt_long_only():
<http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/src/lib/libc/stdlib/getopt_long.c?rev=1.12&content-type=text/x-cvsweb-markup>.
A search of openbsd.org brings up similar results. Here's the
getopt.h from the CVS repo there, also showing a getopt_long_only():
<http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/src/include/getopt.h?rev=1.1&content-type=text/x-cvsweb-markup>.
>>Something like Alex's test program should probably be added to
>>gl_GETOPT, unless someone can suggest a better way to detect or work
>>around the problem.
>
>
>...however, if BSD does not have getopt_long_only, it seems to me that
>the above test should work.
Yes, it should.
Cheers,
Derek
- --
*8^)
Email: address@hidden
Get CVS support at <http://ximbiot.com>!
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFBcAMiLD1OTBfyMaQRApPyAKDmlpIh3GsHQAtygBXobJbcWgpeZACgtt8D
dTluhn9OI/zt47t9n7oKNEc=
=CnR7
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
- [Bug-gnulib] Autoconf and differences between GNU getopt and OpenBSD getopt, Alexander Taler, 2004/10/10
- Re: [Bug-gnulib] Autoconf and differences between GNU getopt and OpenBSD getopt, Paul Eggert, 2004/10/11
- Re: [Bug-gnulib] Autoconf and differences between GNU getopt and OpenBSD getopt, Alexander Taler, 2004/10/12
- Re: [Bug-gnulib] Autoconf and differences between GNU getopt and OpenBSD getopt, Derek Robert Price, 2004/10/14
- [Bug-gnulib] Re: Autoconf and differences between GNU getopt and OpenBSD getopt, Simon Josefsson, 2004/10/15
- Re: [Bug-gnulib] Re: Autoconf and differences between GNU getopt and OpenBSD getopt,
Derek Robert Price <=
- [Bug-gnulib] Re: Autoconf and differences between GNU getopt and OpenBSD getopt, Simon Josefsson, 2004/10/15
- Re: [Bug-gnulib] Re: Autoconf and differences between GNU getopt and OpenBSD getopt, Derek Robert Price, 2004/10/15
- [Bug-gnulib] Re: Autoconf and differences between GNU getopt and OpenBSD getopt, Simon Josefsson, 2004/10/15
- Re: [Bug-gnulib] Re: Autoconf and differences between GNU getopt and OpenBSD getopt, Paul Eggert, 2004/10/15
- [Bug-gnulib] Re: Autoconf and differences between GNU getopt and OpenBSD getopt, Paul Eggert, 2004/10/15
- [Bug-gnulib] Re: Autoconf and differences between GNU getopt and OpenBSD getopt, Simon Josefsson, 2004/10/15
- Message not available
- Re: [Bug-gnulib] Autoconf and differences between GNU getopt and OpenBSD getopt, Alexander Taler, 2004/10/19