[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Bug-gnulib] (x)memdup
From: |
Jim Meyering |
Subject: |
Re: [Bug-gnulib] (x)memdup |
Date: |
Sat, 02 Oct 2004 09:17:21 +0200 |
"Oskar Liljeblad" <address@hidden> wrote:
> Is there any change xclone could be named/aliased 'xmemdup',
> similar to xstrdup? I think (x)memdup is much more straightforward
> for those who know the standard C library. Besides linux has a
> syscall 'clone' which is something completely different.
I like the idea of renaming xclone to xmemdup.
Simon Josefsson wrote:
> Another nit: how about merging xstrdup.c into xmalloc.c? I don't see
> the point of separating the two files. xstrdup is declared in
> xalloc.h, after all.
I agree.