[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Jim Meyering] Re: [Bug-gnulib] strftime merge from Emacs
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: [Jim Meyering] Re: [Bug-gnulib] strftime merge from Emacs |
Date: |
Tue, 10 Jun 2003 07:05:38 +0300 |
> From: Paul Eggert <address@hidden>
> Date: 09 Jun 2003 11:56:30 -0700
> >
> > No, not to my knowledge. These conditionals cover both MinGW and MSVC
> > compilers (the former is a port of GCC and is free software, the
> > latter is Microsoft's proprietary compiler), so something like _MSC
> > (which is special to MSVC) or __GNUC__ alone could do.
>
> __GNUC__ isn't right, since it's defined on other platforms.
My wording above was unfortunately bad. I meant to say that __GNUC__
could *not* do the job.
> gcc-3.3/gcc/config/i386/win32.h says that it always
> defines either (__CYGWIN32__ and __CYGWIN__) or __MINGW32__,
> so you could use "__CYGWIN32__ || __MINGW32__" if you wanted
> to avoid _WIN32.
That would exclude support for the Microsoft's proprietary compiler,
so it's only useful if the port doesn't support it.
Besides, I believe that __CYGWIN32__ is not really desirable since it
still includes "WIN32" as a substring.
> However, isn't this point moot for strftime? Jim Meyering has a
> solution to test for the problem at configure-time, and Microsoft
> Windows doesn't have the problem so it doesn't need to worry about it.
As I said elsewhere in this thread, not every Windows port is
autoconfiscated.
- Re: [Jim Meyering] Re: [Bug-gnulib] strftime merge from Emacs, (continued)
- Re: [Jim Meyering] Re: [Bug-gnulib] strftime merge from Emacs, Richard Stallman, 2003/06/08
- Re: [Jim Meyering] Re: [Bug-gnulib] strftime merge from Emacs, Jim Meyering, 2003/06/09
- Re: [Jim Meyering] Re: [Bug-gnulib] strftime merge from Emacs, Eli Zaretskii, 2003/06/09
- Re: [Jim Meyering] Re: [Bug-gnulib] strftime merge from Emacs, Jim Meyering, 2003/06/09
- Re: [Jim Meyering] Re: [Bug-gnulib] strftime merge from Emacs, Eli Zaretskii, 2003/06/10
- Re: [Jim Meyering] Re: [Bug-gnulib] strftime merge from Emacs, Paul Eggert, 2003/06/09
- Re: [Jim Meyering] Re: [Bug-gnulib] strftime merge from Emacs, Richard Dawe, 2003/06/09
- Re: [Jim Meyering] Re: [Bug-gnulib] strftime merge from Emacs,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: [Jim Meyering] Re: [Bug-gnulib] strftime merge from Emacs, Richard Stallman, 2003/06/09
- Re: [Jim Meyering] Re: [Bug-gnulib] strftime merge from Emacs, Eli Zaretskii, 2003/06/10
Avoiding WIN* macros in GNU code [was Re: [Jim Meyering] Re: [Bug-gnulib] strftime merge from Emacs], Derek Robert Price, 2003/06/09
- Re: [Zlib-devel] Avoiding WIN* macros in GNU code [was Re: [Jim Meyering] Re: [Bug-gnulib] strftime merge from Emacs], Cosmin Truta, 2003/06/12
- Re: [Zlib-devel] Avoiding WIN* macros in GNU code [was Re: [Jim Meyering] Re: [Bug-gnulib] strftime merge from Emacs], Miles Bader, 2003/06/12
- Re: [Zlib-devel] Avoiding WIN* macros in GNU code [was Re: [Jim Meyering] Re: [Bug-gnulib] strftime merge from Emacs], Richard Stallman, 2003/06/12
- [Bug-gnulib] Re: [Zlib-devel] Avoiding WIN* macros in GNU code, Cosmin Truta, 2003/06/12
- [Bug-gnulib] Re: [Zlib-devel] Avoiding WIN* macros in GNU code, Jason Rumney, 2003/06/13
- [Bug-gnulib] Re: [Zlib-devel] Avoiding WIN* macros in GNU code, Richard Stallman, 2003/06/15
Re: [Jim Meyering] Re: [Bug-gnulib] strftime merge from Emacs, Dave Love, 2003/06/10