[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [GnuCOBOL 3.1.2] testsuite: 783 796 failed
From: |
Simon Sobisch |
Subject: |
Re: [GnuCOBOL 3.1.2] testsuite: 783 796 failed |
Date: |
Mon, 15 Aug 2022 14:59:13 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.1.2 |
Am 09.08.2022 um 19:51 schrieb Danny Castillo:
Hello. I have run some checks I have received 31 failed test. I wonder
if I could get some help on solving those issues. I have added the logs
in it
Best Regards
Danny Castillo
Hi Danny and welcome to GnuCOBOL.
Your testlog shows a bunch of expected failures (so things the GnuCOBOL
developers are aware about, but that aren't implemented / fixed yet) and
two "unexpected" failures.
When looking at the NEWS file this is because of the environment used -
Cygwin should work in general (and the testsuite in general shows it
does) but it has two "false positives" that are related in cygwin's
posix api translation of "./prog2" or ".\prog2" to ".prog2" (which is
obviously wrong).
Patches to adjust the testsuite would be accepted.
If you don't use Cygwin for a lot of other things already it is highly
suggested to not use it for GnuCOBOL either - instead use MinGW or MSYS2
based GnuCOBOL binaries (you may even need to do that depending on what
you want to do with the generated binaries as you otherwise link to
cygwin.dll and need to abide to its license) - those are in general
better tested, much more widely used and if you just want to use
GnuCOBOL, you can also get "officially blessed" pre-build binary
packages from https://arnoldtrembley.com/GnuCOBOL.htm
Regards,
Simon