[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: GnuCOBOL 3.1-rc1 on FreeBSD
From: |
Bruno Haible |
Subject: |
Re: GnuCOBOL 3.1-rc1 on FreeBSD |
Date: |
Mon, 13 Jul 2020 18:43:48 +0200 |
User-agent: |
KMail/5.1.3 (Linux/4.4.0-179-generic; KDE/5.18.0; x86_64; ; ) |
Vince,
I'm CCing bug-gnucobol because Simon has asked for feedback from testers,
and therefore I don't want to discuss things in private with you,
excluding him from the audience.
Vince Coen wrote:
> It did pick one - - DB is the default.
>
> BDB is the first one supported over 10 years ago.
> Well over.
Citing Simon's steps for testing:
2 check DEPENDENCIES for the mandatory (mostly gcc + gmp or mpir) and
optional dependencies (berkeley-db, cjson, libxml2, gettext)
Since it's an optional dependency, I expect the configure script to
succeed if that dependency is not present.
> Now I cannot find where the bug feature is at the gnu website but this
> site is NOT monitored
> for bug reporting or anything else for that matter by the GnuCOBOL team.
>
> I suggest you go to the GC website at :
>
>
> www.sourceforge.net/projects/open-cobol/
>
>
> There is an option top, middle to right marked as Tickets then bugs.
When "make check" failed, it told me to send a mail to bug-gnucobol.
If the GNU Cobol team doesn't want to receive these mails there, they
should change the output of "make check" when it fails.
> You only need to issue one per problem regardless of different platforms.
>
>
> That said this is not a bug.
- GnuCOBOL 3.1-rc1 on FreeBSD, Bruno Haible, 2020/07/13
- Message not available
- Re: GnuCOBOL 3.1-rc1 on FreeBSD, Bruno Haible, 2020/07/13
- Message not available
- Re: GnuCOBOL 3.1-rc1 on FreeBSD,
Bruno Haible <=
- Re: GnuCOBOL 3.1-rc1 on FreeBSD, NetBSD and others, Simon Sobisch, 2020/07/13
- Message not available
- Re: GnuCOBOL 3.1-rc1 on FreeBSD, Bruno Haible, 2020/07/13
- Re: GnuCOBOL 3.1-rc1 on FreeBSD, Paul McNary, 2020/07/13
- Re: GnuCOBOL 3.1-rc1 on FreeBSD, Bruno Haible, 2020/07/13