[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Bug-GnuCOBOL] FW: ISAM unhappy

From: Graham Robbins
Subject: [Bug-GnuCOBOL] FW: ISAM unhappy
Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2018 16:06:01 +0000

- GNU Cobol -

Please could you remove Joe Robbins address@hidden from your distribution list. 

Joe died last year.  

Thank you.

Best Regards

Graham Robbins
Director, John Hudson Trailers

Europe’s Largest Hire Fleet of Specialised Trailers
BAWTRY, Doncaster, DN10 6NX, UK

e address@hidden | w www.johnhudson.co.uk
m +44 (0)7720 509 683 | t +44 (0)1302 710 711 

reg 122 12 49 | vat GB 182 629 347 | tva FR 72 490 887 726 | moms SE 502 078 
196 801

-----Original Message-----
From: Bug-GnuCOBOL [mailto:address@hidden On Behalf Of Ron Norman
Sent: 12 January 2018 15:01
To: James K. Lowden <address@hidden>
Cc: address@hidden
Subject: Re: [Bug-GnuCOBOL] ISAM unhappy

I checked the code and that status 91 and message could happen if GnuCOBOL was 
configured with NO ISAM handler at all.
I do not think it defaults to BDB and you likely have to select that.
It looks like it defaults to NO ISAM handler.

On Thu, Jan 11, 2018 at 7:14 PM, James K. Lowden <address@hidden 
<mailto:address@hidden> > wrote:

        Hi all,
        I'm having trouble testing ISAM support with the default Berkeley DB
                libcob: IX101A.CBL: 399: runtime library is not configured for
                this operation (status = 91) file: 'XXXXX024'
        The compiler was built from the distribution tarball:
        $ sed -ne 4,17p config.log
        It was created by GnuCOBOL configure 2.2, which was
        generated by GNU Autoconf 2.69.  Invocation command line was
          $ ../configure
        ## --------- ##
        ## Platform. ##
        ## --------- ##
        hostname = lts16
        uname -m = x86_64
        uname -r = 4.4.0-98-generic
        uname -s = Linux
        uname -v = #121-Ubuntu SMP Tue Oct 10 14:24:03 UTC 2017
        i have not yet determined where in libcob this message comes from, or
        why the system thinks there's no ISAM support.
        I'm also not sure which libcob produces the message.  I would like to
        think it's the one that was installed when the compiler was installed
        (same sources) but perhaps the test programs are built to use the
        not-yet-installed library in the source tree?


Ron Norman

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]