[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Bug-GnuCOBOL] [GnuCOBOL 3.0-dev] testsuite: 256 failed
From: |
Simon Sobisch |
Subject: |
Re: [Bug-GnuCOBOL] [GnuCOBOL 3.0-dev] testsuite: 256 failed |
Date: |
Mon, 18 Dec 2017 13:09:19 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.5.0 |
Am 18.12.2017 um 12:50 schrieb Harald Arnesen:
> Harald Arnesen [2017-12-17 21:49]:
>
>>> Works, both on Linux and macOS. Even better than expected, test 710
>>> passed unexpectedly :-)
>
>> This is unlikely. Please run
>> make clean && make check
>> to verify you don't use an old object file in your cobc binary.
>
> I checked out a new copy from the subversion repository, and I STILL get
> an unexpected pass on test 710.
Then consider creating a bug report for your C compiler/runtime used
there as it stores two different values in the same time in a
static cob_field;
which should get the same value during recursive access but doesn't
(which is the reason the test fails in all other environments)...
> BTW, the file "tarstamp.h" was missing from the checkout, so make
> failed. I copied it from the v2.2 tarfile, and make succeded.
This file and others aren't part of the VCS any more. According to the
HACKING file (which is referenced in the README for VCS checkouts) you
should do
svn checkout
build_aux/bootstrap
./configure # ....
Please check README and HACKING and suggest a better wording if necessary.
Thank you,
Simon
- [Bug-GnuCOBOL] [GnuCOBOL 3.0-dev] testsuite: 256 failed, Harald Arnesen, 2017/12/17
- Re: [Bug-GnuCOBOL] [GnuCOBOL 3.0-dev] testsuite: 256 failed, Simon Sobisch, 2017/12/17
- Re: [Bug-GnuCOBOL] [GnuCOBOL 3.0-dev] testsuite: 256 failed, Harald Arnesen, 2017/12/17
- Re: [Bug-GnuCOBOL] [GnuCOBOL 3.0-dev] testsuite: 256 failed, Simon Sobisch, 2017/12/17
- Re: [Bug-GnuCOBOL] [GnuCOBOL 3.0-dev] testsuite: 256 failed, Harald Arnesen, 2017/12/17
- Re: [Bug-GnuCOBOL] [GnuCOBOL 3.0-dev] testsuite: 256 failed, Simon Sobisch, 2017/12/17
- Re: [Bug-GnuCOBOL] [GnuCOBOL 3.0-dev] testsuite: 256 failed, Harald Arnesen, 2017/12/17
- Re: [Bug-GnuCOBOL] [GnuCOBOL 3.0-dev] testsuite: 256 failed, Harald Arnesen, 2017/12/18
- Re: [Bug-GnuCOBOL] [GnuCOBOL 3.0-dev] testsuite: 256 failed,
Simon Sobisch <=