[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Backgammon "solved"?

From: Øystein Schønning-Johansen
Subject: Re: Backgammon "solved"?
Date: Thu, 5 Dec 2019 23:23:56 +0100

No, the question is fair enough. You just have to apply the FIBS rating formula when you have estimated a winning probability of the strongest player.

On Thu, Dec 5, 2019 at 11:02 PM Theodore Hwa <address@hidden> wrote:
That's not really a fair question. The point is, both GNUBG/XG and a
"perfect bot" are so far above my level, they might as well be the same
thing. You are essentially asking to subtract 2 big numbers to get a small
number, which only gives a meaningful answer if the big numbers are able
to be computed to a very high accuracy.


On Fri, 6 Dec 2019, Joseph Heled wrote:

> (Just out of curiosity)
> A question to you people who think bots play close to a perfect game:
> What do you believe is the difference between GNUB/XG etc and a "perfect bot". Say in a 25 point match. Answers in Elo difference please :)
> Thanks, Joseph

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]