[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: current development

From: Ingo Macherius
Subject: Re: current development
Date: Wed, 4 Dec 2019 19:07:11 +0100
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.2.1

This is not a bug. While individual members of the gnubg team always had setups for dependency management under various IDEs and OSes, there never was a satisfying solution in the repository. There was a Linux package management HOWTO, but it's went away with the rest of the web pages. And no, automake and it's cryptic error message not really qualifies as a dependency management system. I'm a Java guy and used to tool based solutions such as maven or gradle. Picking and adding something similar suiteable for C, ideally something which works on all major OSes, would greatly improve the confusion you and everybody else starting to work with the code has to go through.


Am 04.12.19 um 19:00 schrieb Joseph Heled:
And good riddance. This list is called bug-gnubg.


On Thu, 5 Dec 2019 at 06:59, Ralph Corderoy <address@hidden> wrote:
Hi Joseph,

I was intentionally rude because I thought his original post was
How childish.  We put up with your many posts detailing your failure to
compile from source when a quick Google would have led to the method of
using the package manager to install the build dependencies.  No one was
rude.  You got civil help.

I've no time for such antics.  This list has always been polite in my
experience.  I'm unsubscribing.

Cheers, Ralph.

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]