[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Bug-gnubg] Errors tagging in analysis

From: Ian Shaw
Subject: Re: [Bug-gnubg] Errors tagging in analysis
Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2019 12:24:40 +0000

I'd go with 0.1 for the Blunder. I think that's common usage, so it would make 
Then 0.05 for Error is a nice threshold ,and as you suggest, 0.02 or 0.03 for 

* Ian 

-----Original Message-----
From: Bug-gnubg [mailto:address@hidden On Behalf Of Philippe Michel
Sent: 08 January 2019 21:32
To: address@hidden
Subject: [Bug-gnubg] Errors tagging in analysis

Currently, in GNUbg analysis, bad moves or cube decisions are tagged doubtful, 
bad or very bad when they lose 0.04, 0.08 or 0.16 point. These are default 
values and can be changed in the Settings/Analysis panel.

Looking at recent discussions in online forums (recent being in the last few 
years, not *very* recent), it seems the generally accepted thresholds are now 
somewhat lower. Moves wrong by 0.02-0.03 deserve consideration, 0.10 is a 
serious blunder, something like that.

Would anyone mind if these default values were cut by 1/4, to 0.03, 0.06 and 
0.12 ?

Bug-gnubg mailing list

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]