[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Bug-gnubg] Serious bug: Random.org - Important Request for Comments
From: |
Russ Allbery |
Subject: |
Re: [Bug-gnubg] Serious bug: Random.org - Important Request for Comments |
Date: |
Thu, 15 Jan 2015 23:31:01 -0800 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.4 (gnu/linux) |
Michael Petch <address@hidden> writes:
> On 2015-01-13 7:51 PM, Russ Allbery wrote:
>> That's Debian's position as well, so we always link GPL-covered
>> packages against the GnuTLS build of libcurl in the Debian archives.
> I discovered that Debian has a notice about the licensing issues
> regarding OpenSSL:
> https://lintian.debian.org/tags/possible-gpl-code-linked-with-openssl.html
> I'd be curious if the checks pick up on GPL code that relies on a
> library that in turns relies on OpenSSL.
No, sadly. :/ We usually find that stuff manually.
> I happened to ask this question on a private FSF mailing list and the
> consensus is that linking directly or indirectly to OpenSSL would be a
> licensing issue if you are distributing binaries. That appears to be in
> line with Debian's view as well.
Yeah, Debian and the FSF use basically the same analysis here. Other
organizations have reached different conclusions. It's a murky area of
law that's never been tested in court so far as I know.
--
Russ Allbery (address@hidden) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>
- Re: [Bug-gnubg] Serious bug: Random.org - Important Request for Comments, (continued)
- Re: [Bug-gnubg] Serious bug: Random.org - Important Request for Comments, Michael Petch, 2015/01/13
- Re: [Bug-gnubg] Serious bug: Random.org - Important Request for Comments, Dan Fandrich, 2015/01/13
- Re: [Bug-gnubg] Serious bug: Random.org - Important Request for Comments, Michael Petch, 2015/01/13
- Re: [Bug-gnubg] Serious bug: Random.org - Important Request for Comments, Dan Fandrich, 2015/01/13
- Re: [Bug-gnubg] Serious bug: Random.org - Important Request for Comments, Michael Petch, 2015/01/13
- Re: [Bug-gnubg] Serious bug: Random.org - Important Request for Comments, Michael Petch, 2015/01/13
- Re: [Bug-gnubg] Serious bug: Random.org - Important Request for Comments, Russ Allbery, 2015/01/13
- Re: [Bug-gnubg] Serious bug: Random.org - Important Request for Comments, Superfly Jon, 2015/01/14
- Re: [Bug-gnubg] Serious bug: Random.org - Important Request for Comments, Michael Petch, 2015/01/14
- Re: [Bug-gnubg] Serious bug: Random.org - Important Request for Comments, Michael Petch, 2015/01/15
- Re: [Bug-gnubg] Serious bug: Random.org - Important Request for Comments,
Russ Allbery <=
- Re: [Bug-gnubg] Serious bug: Random.org - Important Request for Comments, Dan Fandrich, 2015/01/16
- Re: [Bug-gnubg] Serious bug: Random.org - Important Request for Comments, Dan Fandrich, 2015/01/14
- Re: [Bug-gnubg] Serious bug: Random.org - Important Request for Comments, Michael Petch, 2015/01/14
Re: [Bug-gnubg] Serious bug: Random.org - Important Request for Comments, Michael Petch, 2015/01/13