[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Bug-gnubg] New stable version?

From: Philippe Michel
Subject: Re: [Bug-gnubg] New stable version?
Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2013 00:52:34 +0100 (CET)
User-agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23)

On Thu, 7 Mar 2013, Russ Allbery wrote:

For example, if you slapped a version number on each version for which
someone felt inspired to provide new "official" Windows binaries, that
would probably be about right.

That seems reasonable. The version numbers have been like 0.n.0 with the third part unused for ages. Maybe we could set the latter to "current" (or "devel", or whatever) in the CVS head and Michael would change that to an increasing number in the copy he would use when building binaries (plus a source snapshot).

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]