Re: [Bug-gnubg] pubeval benchmark

[Mark Higgins]

:) I'll give it a try and check the couple games you sent.


On Jan 19, 2012, at 9:39 AM, Joseph Heled wrote:

> I was asking for help, not for more work.
> 
> For example, anyone who implemented play against pubeval can check a
> few of the moves I sent.
> 
> -Joseph
> 
> On 20 January 2012 03:35, Mark Higgins <address@hidden> wrote:
>> I used the following post to define pubeval; is this the proper definition 
>> still:
>> 
>> http://www.bkgm.com/rgb/rgb.cgi?view+610
>> 
>> ?
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> On Jan 19, 2012, at 8:31 AM, Joseph Heled wrote:
>> 
>>> Hi,
>>> 
>>> I just run 10000 1 point match games between gnubg and pubeval. I
>>> think this is the most fair, since there are no gammons of cubes
>>> involved.
>>> 
>>> However, gnubg won 9840 of those, which makes me think something is wrong.
>>> 
>>> Can someone help me verify that pubeval makes the "right" moves?
>>> 
>>> I can send a few games in oldmoves format, or can check specific moves.
>>> 
>>> I am attaching 2 games as examples.
>>> 
>>> -Joseph
>>> <game1.fibs><game2.fibs>
>>