[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Bug-gnubg] Analyse / Rollout - do we need it?

From: Massimiliano Maini
Subject: Re: [Bug-gnubg] Analyse / Rollout - do we need it?
Date: Sun, 16 Oct 2011 19:34:10 +0200

doubtful/bad/very bad decisions could be "Flagged" moves,
leaving "Marked" for user selected moves.


On 14 October 2011 20:34, Philippe Michel <address@hidden> wrote:
> On Fri, 14 Oct 2011, Michael Petch wrote:
>> On 14/10/2011 4:07 AM, Ian Shaw wrote:
>>> 2) Why is "Cmark" called "Cmark" and not simply "Mark"?  What information
>>> does the "C" convey?
>> I was curious about this naming convention as well. It has confused some
>> people in the past. They thought CMARK was to mark cubes. Simply going
>> with "Mark" makes sense to me.
> "Mark" is somehow already used for for the doubtful/bad/very bad decisions.
> See the red arrows vs. blue arrows in the GUI.
> "CMark" is still not very expressive, of course.
> _______________________________________________
> Bug-gnubg mailing list
> address@hidden
> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gnubg

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]