[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Bug-gnubg] Analyse / Rollout - do we need it?

From: Philippe Michel
Subject: Re: [Bug-gnubg] Analyse / Rollout - do we need it?
Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2011 20:34:00 +0200 (CEST)
User-agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23)

On Fri, 14 Oct 2011, Michael Petch wrote:

On 14/10/2011 4:07 AM, Ian Shaw wrote:

2) Why is "Cmark" called "Cmark" and not simply "Mark"? What information does the "C" convey?

I was curious about this naming convention as well. It has confused some
people in the past. They thought CMARK was to mark cubes. Simply going
with "Mark" makes sense to me.

"Mark" is somehow already used for for the doubtful/bad/very bad decisions. See the red arrows vs. blue arrows in the GUI.

"CMark" is still not very expressive, of course.

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]