bug-gnubg
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Bug-gnubg] computer vs. computer


From: Øystein Johansen
Subject: Re: [Bug-gnubg] computer vs. computer
Date: Mon, 5 Apr 2010 19:23:56 +0200

I'm not a Mac user myself, so I do not know. I'm forwarding this to the mailing list. (I guess you forgot to add a cc.)

-Øystein

2010/4/5 Julian Wilson <address@hidden>
hello

Can anyone help me with what I suspect is a stupid question.

I'm a new GNU user and use a MAC.

I cannot seem to set up a position. My windows friends say that this is because I do not have a right click mouse....

I'm sure there must be a workround/alternative for mac.

Thanks in anticipation.


On 3 Apr 2010, at 20:03, Øystein Johansen wrote:

Hi,

Thanks for your effort. The difference in strength between 0-ply and 2-ply is significant, but not so much stronger that it is possible to make a clear statement after 10 games. I suggests you play 100.000 games and then report the result.

I've done such experiments my self,  and I can assure you that 2-ply is stronger than 0-ply. You can take my word for it, or you can extend your experiment. :-)

Thanks anyway!
-Øystein
   

On Sat, Apr 3, 2010 at 8:50 PM, tocy <address@hidden> wrote:

i made an experiment and let the computer play against computer with gnubg
program, one side played with "ply-0" level and one side played with "ply-2"
level,
guess who kept win again and again about 10 times or more?the side who
played with level "ply-0",
how is that possible?
--
View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/computer-vs.-computer-tp28128791p28128791.html
Sent from the Gnu - Backgammon mailing list archive at Nabble.com.



_______________________________________________
Bug-gnubg mailing list
address@hidden
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gnubg

_______________________________________________
Bug-gnubg mailing list
address@hidden
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gnubg



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]