Ingo, regarding your original
cache test, would it be possible to send me your matches that you analyzed
for this test. These 5 matches must have been pretty short.
were real word FIBS 7pt matches I played around the time of the benchmark,
randomly chosen with a bit of a focus on "long" 7pt
I am wondering if the way
you use Gnugb from the command line with the types of matches you are
running result in cache performance that differs significantly from me.
Command line, I've also attached the scripts used. Please note
that they are not polished and I've edited them during benching so the
number of loops in the scripts may just do apartial test when used as-is.
Use with care and a brain. Otherwise that's exactly what I
My normal usage from the command line
is to load a Match play match, usually between 5 and 15pts run an
analysis and save the sgf file along with html. This is done in batch or
individually. Having cache on makes considerable difference. If I can get
your matches and run them in your experiment I’d like to see what I
Would be great to hear about the