[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Bug-gnubg] Feature Request: Differential reporting of rollout resu
Re: [Bug-gnubg] Feature Request: Differential reporting of rollout results
Wed, 1 Jul 2009 09:33:25 +1200
I think keeping existing options is good - the one serious argument for removing them is when they become a (code) maintenance burden. Is that the case here?
This is separate from the issue of user interface/interaction. My personal preference is (I think) close to Ian. Show the full set once (the "default"), then list only deviations from it.
On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 8:56 PM, motiv4u <address@hidden>
> In the interest of compromise, I would not oppose the removal of thePlease do keep the 'read from file'
> Ansi, BSD, and either the ISSAC or MD5. I would have to research those more
> to form a firm opinion. That would leave the Mersenne Twister, the Blum,
> Blum, & Shub, Random.org, manual dice, and the read from file. I am very
> opposed to removing all the generators besides Mersenne Twister and manual
> dice. I think that with some research into the various generators the list
> could be pared down but not as severely as Ian and Max suggest.
If all others disappear, it'll give you at least the possibility to use them.
Re: [Bug-gnubg] Feature Request: Differential reporting of rollout results, Myshkin LeVine, 2009/06/29