|Subject:||Re: [Bug-gnubg] Win gcc3 / gcc43 / gcc44|
|Date:||Fri, 26 Jun 2009 10:02:09 +0000|
No worries, I'll stand down :) I wasn't likely to make the changes properly in|
a hurry anyway. At least we know the move to v3 will be relatively easy.
Massimiliano Maini wrote:
> Christian Anthon wrote on 25/06/2009 19:47:44:
>> On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 1:39 PM, Jonathan Kinsey
>> com> wrote:
>>> I doubt it's worth moving up to 2.6.1, better to move to version 3.
> It will
>>> take a few changes though. I just built Python 3 with dev studio and
>>> some changes to get gnubg to build, namely:
>>> PyInt -> PyLong
>>> PyString -> PyUnicode (needs more work)
>>> Py_InitModule -> PyModule_Create
>> Just make sure that the changes are compatible with the 2.4-2.6 python
>> versions as most linux will have those for some time.
> On python.org they advise, in general, to stick to 2.6 since it is/will be
> for a while more compatible/supported.
Beyond Hotmail - see what else you can do with Windows Live. Find out more.
|[Prev in Thread]||Current Thread||[Next in Thread]|