Re: [Bug-gnubg] Win gcc3 / gcc43 / gcc44

[Jonathan Kinsey]

No worries, I'll stand down :) I wasn't likely to make the changes properly in
a hurry anyway. At least we know the move to v3 will be relatively easy.

Jon

Massimiliano Maini wrote:
>
> Christian Anthon wrote on 25/06/2009 19:47:44:
>
>> On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 1:39 PM, Jonathan Kinsey
>> com> wrote:
>>> I doubt it's worth moving up to 2.6.1, better to move to version 3.
> It will
>>> take a few changes though. I just built Python 3 with dev studio and
> made
>>> some changes to get gnubg to build, namely:
>>>
>>> PyInt -> PyLong
>>> PyString -> PyUnicode (needs more work)
>>> Py_InitModule -> PyModule_Create
>>>
>>
>> Just make sure that the changes are compatible with the 2.4-2.6 python
>> versions as most linux will have those for some time.
>>
>> Christian.
>
> On python.org they advise, in general, to stick to 2.6 since it is/will be
> for a while more compatible/supported.
>
> MaX.

---

Beyond Hotmail - see what else you can do with Windows Live. Find out more.