[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Bug-gnubg] eXtreme Gammon

From: Michael Petch
Subject: Re: [Bug-gnubg] eXtreme Gammon
Date: Wed, 27 May 2009 12:14:14 -0600
User-agent: Microsoft-Entourage/

On 27/05/09 12:02 PM, "Thomas A. Moulton" <address@hidden> wrote:

> More to the point...
> The GPL only is concerned about the changes to the original code,
> since as a commercial product the full source is very unlikely to
> be distributed...
> I am just pointing out there is nothing personal about any of this
> (and let's not start a gpl means this or that debate! LOL)

Its not personal for me either. Commercial/NonCommercial, best friend/worst
enemy I'd be asking the same questions.

If done right they don't need to make the entire clients source code
available. If they produced a module that runs in a separate process (Not a
DLL) that houses their neural network that is based on a  GPL'ed component
then only that component would need to have the source code made available.

The other question is... Was Gary Wong's original 0.00 release actually
"GnuBG" or was it something else with a more open license. There was
definitely a version of GnuBG-0.02.

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]