[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Bug-gnubg] Removal of non-threaded code

From: Jonathan Kinsey
Subject: Re: [Bug-gnubg] Removal of non-threaded code
Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2009 15:43:09 +0000

I'm definitely for removing the non-threaded code. Personally I would just have
threaded code - are there any systems which don't support threads?

Ideally someone could run some tests on a single core machine to see how much
slower the threaded code is (with one thread) compared to the single-threaded
code. My guess is a couple of percent, but that is a guess.


Christian Anthon wrote:
> Hi all,
> I'm considering to remove the non-threaded code. The threaded code
> should be able to run without threads with minor adjustments (replacing
> thread-safe operations with equivalent unsafe ones or NULL operations as
> appropriate), and we wouldn't have two sets of code to keep working at
> the same time. There may still be a small time-penalty involved. Anybody
> with a strong opinion against this?
> Christian.
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> _______________________________________________
> Bug-gnubg mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gnubg

Surfing the web just got more rewarding. Download the New Internet Explorer 8

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]