Re: [Bug-gnubg] Problems with Gnubg 04-Mar-2009 release
From:
Massimiliano Maini
Subject:
Re: [Bug-gnubg] Problems with Gnubg 04-Mar-2009 release
Date:
Tue, 17 Mar 2009 09:34:12 +0100
> Tutor and Analysis, places their results in the same list. Only one
> result per move is allowed.
True. But it seems to me that the "tutor analysis"
is saved during the match and, at the end of the match, if you analyze it again,
if the tutor level equals the analysis level (e.g both world class),
then the analysis is much faster since it is already done. In fact, putting gnubg player 0 at the same level
as evaluation and analysis and tutor (e.g. world class) used to make the post-match
analysis extremely fast, since most of the job is already done. But it's
no longer the case.
> > I think it has already been reported and, if I'm not wrong, an
easy
> > solution would be to sort the moves by cubeful equity and then
by
> > cubeless equity: when all of them have cubeful equity +1.000
(or -1.000),
> > this should prevent odd-looking moves. Not a big deal however,
the
> > match is already won/lost ...
>
> No that won't help. If all moves corresponds to
> "game(gammon/backgammon) won/lost" they cannot be sorted
by
> evaluation, but need some "human" quality added to them.
For example
> maximum number of cross-overs.
You're right. The cubeless trick was ok only for cases
where after the current move there's a double pass (all cubeful equities
= -1.000).