Jonathan Kinsey <address@hidden> wrote
on 28/01/2009 15:38:05:
> Massimiliano Maini wrote:
> >
> > address@hidden wrote
on
> > 28/01/2009 14:34:57:
> >
> >>> Jonathan Kinsey wrote:
> >>> I just tried that (I can reproduce the problem with the
latest install
> >>> but not
> >>> if i build the code) and it worked fine after "set
cache 0".
> >
> > Ouch, scary. Definitely worth an investigation. Any idea where
I should
> > look at ?
> > Makefiles differences maybe ? Config.h differences ?
>
> The easiest approach is probably to just add some test code:
> ((cacheNode*)e)->ar[5] = ((cacheNode*)e)->ar[6] = 0;
>
> to the start of CacheAdd() and see if that fixes the problem for people.
This
> code will probably change when I get around to it anyway.
>
> Jon
I'm building the executable right now. I'll send it to you right after. Do you need the one
with the debug informations in ? Zipped it's 3Mb instead of 0.7Mb ... I can also
send it to Nardy (let me know Nardy).
You just have to put it in the latest distrib install
dir and see if yuo can reproduce ...