Re: [Bug-gnubg] It is my turn.

[Joseph Heled]

On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 11:27 AM, Christian Anthon
<address@hidden> wrote:
> Hi Joseph,
>
> I'll gladly take a look at your dobling code, can you point me to the
> location in the code?
>
> What I meant was that it was partly a fault in the neural net, I
> didn't assume you had written the resign code in gnubg.

OK. I would not have been surprised at the rejection if I was playing
at ply 0. I was surprised only because I set play evaluation at 2 ply.

 You can work your way up from gnubg/gnubg-nn/analyze/danalyze.cc

Personally, I would start with  http://fibs2html.sourceforge.net/ code.

-Joseph

>
> Christian.
>
> On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 9:59 PM, Joseph Heled <address@hidden> wrote:
>> On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 10:14 PM, Christian Anthon
>> <address@hidden> wrote:
>>> Well Joseph you are partly to blame :).
>>
>> Well, that shows you had not been around as long as I am :) I did not
>> write this code. My code always used a different (and I think
>> superior) cube handling method, and always worked at any ply. it is in
>> the gnubg-nn branch if you are interested. it is C++.
>>
>> -Joseph
>>
>>>  Accept/Reject decision were
>>> investigated at 0ply regardless of the player settings, and 0ply
>>> believes that you loose 1% gammon here. I'm going to up the test to
>>> 2ply, it won't be perfect, but certainly better. Alternatively we
>>> could run a one-sided rollout, if somebody thinks it is necessary?
>>>
>>> Christian.
>>>
>>> On Sun, Nov 9, 2008 at 3:49 AM, Joseph Heled <address@hidden> wrote:
>>>> I offer to resign normal. gnubg declines. why?
>>>>
>>>> KwAA4L61BAAAAA:UQngAUAAUAAA
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Bug-gnubg mailing list
>>>> address@hidden
>>>> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gnubg
>>>>
>>>
>>
>