[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Bug-gnubg] New release number 0.9.0-1
From: |
Achim Mueller |
Subject: |
Re: [Bug-gnubg] New release number 0.9.0-1 |
Date: |
Mon, 31 Mar 2008 10:47:40 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.16 (2007-06-09) |
* Massimiliano Maini <address@hidden> [080331 10:25]:
> address@hidden wrote on
> 28/03/2008 15:43:34:
>
> > Hi folks,
> >
> > I changed the release number to 0.9.0-1 now. Changelog and configure.in
> > are corrected.
>
> I find the current setup pretty confusing.
>
> - in the rel_0_9_0 branch, the version is 0.9.0-1: what's the -1 supposed
> to indicate ?!
> - in the main branch, the version is 0.9.0 ?!
Ooops, my error. The -1 shouldn't occur there. I'll correct it as soon
as possible.
-1 -2 -3 etc for small bugfixes. 0.9.1 0.9.5 1.0 for John's
suggested roadmap. The -[number] is only for the rpms.
It's like the old rel_0_15.
> I don't think we need a separate stable branch until we reach something
> that is really
> stable (in Christian suggestion non branch was requested).
I haven't read that, but I can delete the rel_0_9_0 again, if there is
no need for it.
Ciao
Achim
- [Bug-gnubg] New release number 0.9.0-1, Achim Mueller, 2008/03/28
- RE: [Bug-gnubg] New release number 0.9.0-1, Jonathan Kinsey, 2008/03/28
- Re: [Bug-gnubg] New release number 0.9.0-1, Russ Allbery, 2008/03/28
- Re: [Bug-gnubg] New release number 0.9.0-1, Massimiliano Maini, 2008/03/31
- Re: [Bug-gnubg] New release number 0.9.0-1,
Achim Mueller <=
- Re: [Bug-gnubg] New release number 0.9.0-1, Jonathan Kinsey, 2008/03/31
- Re: [Bug-gnubg] New release number 0.9.0-1, Christian Anthon, 2008/03/31
- Re: [Bug-gnubg] New release number 0.9.0-1, Massimiliano Maini, 2008/03/31
- Re: [Bug-gnubg] New release number 0.9.0-1, Achim Mueller, 2008/03/31
- Re: [Bug-gnubg] New release number 0.9.0-1, Massimiliano Maini, 2008/03/31