[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Bug-gnubg] Beavers ?
From: |
Christian Anthon |
Subject: |
Re: [Bug-gnubg] Beavers ? |
Date: |
Wed, 27 Feb 2008 09:46:56 +0100 |
Can't make this happen either. Strange.
Christian.
On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 11:33 AM, Massimiliano Maini
<address@hidden> wrote:
>
> "Christian Anthon" <address@hidden> wrote on 25/02/2008
> 23:24:58:
>
>
> > Stumbled over this one and couldn't reproduce.
> >
> > Christian.
> >
> > On Fri, Jan 18, 2008 at 5:05 PM, Massimiliano Maini
> > <address@hidden> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > there's something wrong ni the stats for money sessions with beavers.
> > >
> > > Even if the double decision was double/beaver, the beaver is counted as
> an
> > > error for the "beavering" player ...
> > >
> > > I have one sgf file if somebody is interested, but it's very easy to
> > > reproduce: 1 roll, double, beaaver, take, roll.
> > > Stop and anlyse.
> > >
> > > MaX.
>
> Neither do I ... strange.
> But there's something strange anyway: start a money session where gnubg
> plays first.
> After his move, double immediately (this typically leads to a beaver). Take,
> roll and
> move, then anaylse the session. You'll see some crap in the analysis pane
> for the initial double.
>
> MaX.
>
>
>