Christian Anthon wrote:
> On 7/1/07, Joseph Heled <address@hidden> wrote:
>> Thanks, I know the workaround, but this is really not the way it
>> should be.
>>
> I think the reason is that Jon didn't have any .fibs files when he
> wrote the file recognition code, and thought the format rather unused
> anyway (there is also a bug report on the fibs format not getting
> imported correctly). But, you are more than welcome to update the code
> in this area.
You're mostly right, the problem I think was that the fibs file format is so
open it can just be normal text (for comments), so it is difficult to
distinguish from a text file. Maybe I just had an odd example.
Jon