[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Réf . : RE: [Bug-gnubg] Analysis bug ?
From: |
Christian Anthon |
Subject: |
Re: Réf . : RE: [Bug-gnubg] Analysis bug ? |
Date: |
Fri, 10 Mar 2006 16:19:55 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.10i |
On Fri, Mar 10, 2006 at 04:06:51PM +0100, address@hidden wrote:
> I agree. It is too good only if the equity is > 1.0
>
> What surprises me is that the analysis/hint code gets it right (eq < 1.0
> --> it's not too good, in the example, it wasn't even a double), while
> the code that summarizes the statistics for the match/game gets it wrong,
> as if it was doing his own computations instead of reusing the ones
> already done (and stored in the analysis) ... or at least, the statistics
> code is doing something different wrt the analysis/hint code ...
It does redo the computations. What it gets wrong is that it for some
strange reason think the cube is a pass.
When, in the analysis it checks whether it is a take or a drop it use
logic like:
if( -arDouble[ OUTPUT_DROP ] < -arDouble[ OUTPUT_TAKE ] ) {
So it is a code inconsistency which should be corrected anyway. What I
don't get is why it arrives at pass, when it checks for the reason for
the double being bad.
Christian
- [Bug-gnubg] Analysis bug ?, Massimiliano . Maini, 2006/03/07
- RE: [Bug-gnubg] Analysis bug ?, Jonathan Kinsey, 2006/03/07
- RE: RE: [Bug-gnubg] Analysis bug ?, Massimiliano . Maini, 2006/03/07
- Réf. : RE: [Bug-gnubg] Analysis bug ?, Massimiliano . Maini, 2006/03/09
- RE: Réf. : RE: [Bug-gnubg] Analysis bug ?, Jonathan Kinsey, 2006/03/09
- Réf. : RE: Réf. : RE: [Bug-gnubg] Analysis bug ?, Massimiliano . Maini, 2006/03/09
- RE: Réf. : RE: Réf. : RE: [Bug-gnubg] Analysis bug ?, Jonathan Kinsey, 2006/03/10
- RE: [Bug-gnubg] Analysis bug ?, Christian Anthon, 2006/03/10
- Réf. : RE: [Bug-gnubg] Analysis bug ?, Massimiliano . Maini, 2006/03/10
- Re: Réf . : RE: [Bug-gnubg] Analysis bug ?,
Christian Anthon <=
- Réf. : Re: Réf. : RE: [Bug-gnubg] Analysis bug ?, Massimiliano . Maini, 2006/03/13
Re: [Bug-gnubg] Analysis bug ?, Jim Segrave, 2006/03/08