On 8/24/05, Joseph Heled <address@hidden> wrote:
gnubg is under the GPL, which makes it great for people like you who
would like to experiment.
i'm aware that i can go and modify the code any way i want. perhaps my
question would be better phrased: would the primary authors accept a
change to the current make system?
BTW, can you define "robust?"
i
would consider a robust make system to allow checking out CVS head,
configuring the type of build i want, and typing make. it's quite
possible that this works for the main devs, but it certainly has never worked
for me (on OSX). i simply think it can be done better, but don't want to waste my time if people won't be interested in it.
nall