[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Bug-gnubg] Re: Final GTK 1.3 Build, gnubg Documentation Bug Report
From: |
Jim Segrave |
Subject: |
Re: [Bug-gnubg] Re: Final GTK 1.3 Build, gnubg Documentation Bug Report |
Date: |
Wed, 27 Apr 2005 21:46:06 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.4.2.1i |
On Wed 27 Apr 2005 (12:16 +0200), ?ystein O Johansen wrote:
> > 1. After analyzing a match, I've noticed that some, not all, of
> > the moves shown in "details" as being doubtful, bad, etc. are not
> > marked as such with the color scheme in the "move record" window.
> > I've observed this in analysis of multiple matchs.
The only thing I've seen is that if you re-evaluate an analysed move -
say you analysed on 0 ply to save time, if you then use the two button
to get a better evaluation, it doesn't always (or maybe never) show up
in the game record annotations or background colours
> Hmmm... I have not seen this my self. Are the evaluations with the
> same settings?
>
> > 2. There is a typographical and grammatical error: "gnubg don't
> > use prunning", for example, in neural net dialog box.
>
> I guess "<playername> will not use prunning neural net" is better?
almost - 'pruning' with one 'n' :)
--
Jim Segrave address@hidden