[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Bug-gnubg] Database interface
From: |
Joern Thyssen |
Subject: |
Re: [Bug-gnubg] Database interface |
Date: |
Tue, 25 May 2004 14:13:57 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.4.2.1i |
On Tue, May 25, 2004 at 01:44:24PM +0000, Marco van Tol wrote
> On Tue, May 25, 2004 at 01:12:56PM +0100, Jon Kinsey wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> > I'm not sure about using python to access the database. It wasn't a
> > problem as there is a pysqlite module, I just don't think it's
> > necessary. To put it another way, it adds a dependency that isn't
> > strictly required. I imagine the code could easily be changed so that
> > the database access is in the C layer and the python code changed to use
> > this. Is there any other reason to use python for this?
>
> Perhaps more to give a signal of life then to contribute something useful:
> I'm a bit curious to know the answer to this as well. :)
>
> I actually currently compile gnubg on my FreeBSD machine with
> 'WITHOUT_PYTHON' so it doesn't consume _all available cpu_ even while not
> really doing anything. Not sure if that's FreeBSD specific though.
that's a weird problem... Are you sure that it is python that consumes
CPU time? I'm guesing that it's a GTK+ problem...
Jørn